Christ Church crosses

Christ Church, Summit NJ

Home Page

 

Sermons

 


Collection Plate  Donations are welcome! 
[ previous | index | next ] © 2002 Tom Reiber

Hell and Other Happy Endings

By Tom Reiber

August 11, 2002

OT: Micah 7: 18-20 and NT: II Corinthians 12: 1-6


I '
m of the opinion that when it comes to religion, as with many subjects, many of us tend to have a pretty basic set of thoughts and questions. When it comes to religion and the afterlife, we worry about hell and hope we're going to heaven. Comedian Steve Martin plays on these anxieties in a bit in which he dies and goes to heaven and is shocked to find that everything he had been taught as kid had been true. Then he's told how many times he has taken the Lord's name in vain over the course of his lifetime, a number so staggering it prompts him to do so yet one more time.

No matter how liberated we are we never fully escape some of the traditional ideas that were drilled into us. I ran into Brooke Laughlin the other day and she got to talking about her plant watering duties here in the sanctuary. She told me about getting locked out and feeling the guilt of being the one who allowed the church plants to die, knowing that that couldn't be a good thing in the bigger scheme of things.

Or consider this email from Quimby, who's up in Main, overseeing the construction of his new place:

I was painting my barn today, and it reminded me of a time when I was I young man painting my Aunt Ruby's House. As the day went on I realized that I didn't have enough paint. If I drove to town to get more I would never get done in time for Saturday night in Mt. Vernon (always a swinging time.) So, I watered down the two gallons I had left, but just as I was almost finished it began to pour a rainstorm like our town had never seen before. As the paint began running off the side of my Aunt's house I looked up and said "Lord what shall I do?" I was stunned when a booming voice echoed from on high: "Repaint and thin no more".

In addition to this humorous and anecdotal backdrop, we've also got whole theological movements springing up around these issues. As the idea of sin, hell and damnation played themselves out in the religious world, you had your Calvinists asserting that God had predestined a select group for heaven, the rest were doomed. The Universalists sprang up in reaction to the Calvinists. As their name implies, they believed that salvation was intended to be a universal experience; that everybody was going to heaven. In time the Universalists joined forces with the Unitarians, giving birth to the modern day association known as the Unitarian Universalists. Now before you all run out and join the UU's, let me say that I think it's high time we re-evaluate our own thinking in relation to the threat of hell.

I'm reminded of a conversation I had with some of our middle schoolers in which I admitted that I didn't believe in hell as it has been traditionally described. One of them (who will remain anonymous) followed that all the way through to its logical end, asking, “Then why are we here?” The implication was that the only reason we would go to church or even pause to consider the good life is because of the threat of everlasting punishment.

Even after the transforming tidal wave of the scientific revolution, we can't help but wonder what will happen when we die. That curiosity and concern often blends into our general fear of the unknown, of mortality and death, and we're left with a vague desire to be “good” as a way of hedging our bets. But that doesn't advance our understanding of the spiritual life all that much. In fact, it really infantilizes us into thinking in terms of rewards and punishments, as opposed to a bolder approach rooted in an enthusiasm for life, for its beauty and harmony, its highs and lows, its passions and challenges. I think there's potential for us to push ourselves more on this front, so that we're not doing the right thing in hopes of tilting some kind of cosmic scale in our favor, but rather because we are being drawn into a more intimate relationship with God.

These kinds of considerations find artful and at times hilarious expression in the movie, Defending Your Life. In it, Albert Brooks plays Dan, a guy who gets hit by a bus and suddenly finds himself in Judgment City, the place where you go after you die. At first glance it appears this is worst-case scenario: right after you die you're put on trial and have to defend your every action. But it turns out there's a twist: you get judged not on whether or not you lived a perfect life, but on the degree to which you learned to overcome your fears. You sit in front of a big screen and scenes of your life are shown as if you're watching a movie. Rip Torn, who plays the heavenly equivalent of a defense attorney, breaks it down for Dan this way: “Most people on Earth only use a tiny portion of their brain,” he says, adding the aside that, because of that, the attorneys in Judgment City refer to newcomers as “little brains.” “Because you only use a tiny portion of your brain,” he explains, “most of your energy goes into battling fear. The purpose of Judgment City, is to see how far along a person is in relation to your chief task during your life on Earth: overcoming fear.”

As Dan's trial unfolds, we get the feeling that he may not be moving on to the next plane of existence. The prosecutor mercilessly moves from scene to scene in his life, showing repeated incidents of fear holding him back. In one, he asks his wife to role-play so he can practice asking for a raise. He sets his sights very high, and in the role-play his is firm about not being able to accept anything less than the amount he has set. Then they cut to the actual interview with his boss and he immediately caves in to a low-ball figure.

The plot jumps forward when Dan meets Julia (played by Meryl Streep). Julia is full of life and wonder, personifying fearless love and feminine grace. She invites Albert over to one of her screenings one day. He slips unnoticed into the back of the courtroom and is immediately mesmerized by the image on the screen. You see a house engulfed in flames. Julia comes running out, carrying one of her children and leading another by the hand. Then she dashes back into the house, emerging seconds later with the family cat. Whereas in Dan's trial the judges look on with stern aloofness, in Julia's trial they're actually oohing and awing over her bravery and courage. When the lights come on in the courtroom, one of the judges thanks everyone for indulging his desire to watch the scene again for the second time. Suffice it to say that none of this helps Dan's already failing self-esteem.

His struggle with his fear soon bleeds beyond the confines of his courtroom experience to his limbo existence in Judgment City. The place has been intentionally designed to look like the world left behind, right down to the new strip mall that's opening up. One of the perks of being there is the food is delicious and you can eat all you want without gaining a pound. Julia takes advantage of the opportunity, enjoying the pleasure of good food and the newfound freedom from caloric concern. But Dan is self-conscious about overdoing it, afraid of what others might think.

Just when you think Dan is hopelessly mired in his little brain, fear-based approach to life, he rises to the occasion and takes a brave risk. After losing his court battle and being informed that he's going back to Earth for another try, he climbs aboard an Earthbound tram, crushed and dejected. But then he sees Julia in another tram, headed for a different destination. And suddenly he gets it: he realizes that if he wants to experience love, he's going to have to take some risks. He leaps out of his tram, zigs and zags his way through several others and leaps up onto the side of Julia's. Eventually the door opens and he's allowed in, moving on to the next level by the skin of his teeth!

Our sacred scripture tells us that “perfect love casts out fear”(I John 4:18). The idea seems to be that love and fear are mutually incompatible. Fear is about self, about survival, about warding off threats and avoiding injury. This is a mode of existence that has been hard-wired into us over millions and billions of years. That's why it is so easy to slip into self-defense mode. As soon as life's air-raid sirens begin to rev up we're heading for the bomb shelters, closing off the rest of the world in a panicked flight for survival. That can come about from the threat of physical attack, but it can also come about from the threat of psychological attack. We sense rejection or a struggle and we become the psychological equivalent of Fort Knox, guarding our spiritual gold with big, thick walls.

Love moves from a deeper place. It might not have the million years of hard wiring supporting it, but some people believe it's the end-goal that it's all moving toward. Maybe we had to start with physical survival to get to this point, but now new modes of being are being birthed. Maybe this is what Jesus saw and tried to communicate: this new mode of being called love. Jesus realized that there were worse things than being hurt or killed, that we are more than mere physiological organisms tasked with survival; we are spiritual beings able to commune with the transcendent powers of the universe, able to see and revere the divine spark within all people.

When you take in the full breadth of what Jesus seems to have said, you end up with a rejection of the world as it gets spun and dangled before us. I think that's why so many of his parables imply that the spiritual life involves a deep giving up. Think of the woman who loses a coin or the shepherd who lost a sheep: they let everything go in order to find what was lost. I think Jesus was saying that that needs to be our attitude about our lives, that we have to be willing to risk it all. Like the mountain lion and the dandelion, like the ocean wave and the sun's rays, we are embedded in the mysterious fabric of life.

How silly to waste our energies seeking security, when we are but a ripple on the cosmic pond. How much better to marvel at our gliding movement across the surface of the deep and enjoy the ride.

Huston Smith, the scholar of world religions, reveals something of his own struggles around hell and the traditional teaching on the subject in his latest book, Why Religion Matters: The Fate of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelief. Near the end of the book he recounts a trip he took to India in 1964 as part of a semester's leave of study.

“At the moment to be described,” he writes, “I was conversing with one of a number of gurus whose reputations had taken me to the foothills of the Himalayas, when suddenly there appeared in the doorway of the bungalow I was in a figure so striking that or a moment I thought I might be seeing an apparition. Tall, dressed in a white gown, and with a full beard, it was a man I cam to know as Father Lazarus, a missionary of the Eastern Orthodox Church who had spent the last twenty years in India. Ten minutes after I was introduced to him I had forgotten my gurus completely…and for a solid week we tramped the Himalayan foothills talking nonstop.

“…I had told him that I found myself strongly attracted to Hinduism because of its doctrine of universal salvation. Everyone makes it in the end. Its alternative, eternal damnation, struck me as monstrous doctrine that I could not accept.

“Brother Lazarus responded by telling me his views on that matter. They took off from the passage in Second Corinthians where Saint Paul tells of knowing someone who …had been caught up into the third heaven…. Paul …goes on to say that in that heaven the man ‘heard things that were not to be told, that no mortal is permitted to repeat.' Father Lazarus quoted the passages verbatim. Paul was speaking of himself, Father Lazarus was convinced, and the secret he was told in the third heaven was the ultimately everyone is saved. That is the fact of the matter, Father Lazarus believed, but it must not be told because the uncomprehending would take it as license for irresponsibility.

“That exegesis solved my problem and has stayed in place ever since…” (pp. 269-270).

I like this anecdote in part because Huston Smith has always struck me as someone who appreciated the real beauty of religion. Whether he's describing Hinduism or Islam, Judaism or Christianity, he sees past the petty attempts at manipulation to that which is essential. He brings you to the edge of the numinous, to the transcendent dimension of these various traditions. Here in his candid thoughts about life after death, he helps us see that in our “little brain” sort of way we've shrunk the mystery of death down to the oversimplified categories of heaven and hell. Of course the truth is, the mystery far exceeds them. When we begin to open up to the mystery, we open to our own lives in a way that enables us to face the fear and anxieties that, left untendend, can choke us like so many spiritual weeds.

Thomas Merton, the Trappist monk, was a spiritual pioneer in the sense of someone who has gone before, facing the unknown with marvelous spiritual courage. He describes an early, formative experience, which took place when he was passing through Rome as an 18 year old. Not a highly religious person at this point in his life, he says the images of Christ were beginning to work their way into his psyche. Then he had this experience:

I was in my room. It was night. The light was on. Suddenly it seemed to me that [my] Father, who had been dead more than a year, was there with me. The sense of his presence was so vivid and as real and as startling as if he had touched my arm or spoken to me. The whole thing passed in a flash, but in that flash, instantly, I was overwhelmed with a sudden and profound insight into the misery and corruption of my own soul, and I was pierced deeply with a light that made me realize something of the condition I was in, and I was filled with horror at what I saw, and my whole being rose up in revolt against what was within me, and my soul desired escape and liberation and freedom from all this with an intensity and an urgency unlike anything I had ever known before. And now I think for the first time I really began to pray—praying not with my lips and with my intellect and my imagination, but praying out of the very roots of my life, of my being, and praying to the God I had never known, to reach down towards me out of His darkness and to help me get free of the thousand terrible things that held my will in their slavery” (Thomas Merton: Essential Writings, p. 31).

When the manifold depths of reality are opened before us in this way, we glimpse, even if just for a moment, “the unbearable lightness of being,” we sense an invitation to venture more deeply into the mysteries of our existence. My point today is a simple one: I think we need to move beyond scare tactics about heaven and hell and realize that the spiritual adventure begins now, in this moment, and this moment. Every moment is a window onto the eternal now.

Back to Huston Smith. After sharing the anecdote about his encounter with the Orthodox priest in the Himalayas, Smith concludes his most recent book, perhaps one of his last, with his own best guess concerning what will happen after he dies. We read these words yesterday at a small graveside service for Amanda Crosby, whose ashes were placed back in the Earth. You may recall that in the spring, in the public memorial service, some were sprinkled on a hawk that was then released. As we read these words yesterday, a hawk appeared high in the sky, lit up by the sun.

“After I shed my body, I will continue to be conscious of the life I have lived and the people who remain on Earth. Sooner or later, however, there will come a time when no one alive will have heard of me, let alone known me, whereupon there ceases to be any point in my hanging around. Echoing [a] reported farewell, ‘Thanks, thanks for everything; praise, praise, for it all….'

“As long as I continue to be involved with my individuality, I will retain awareness that it is I, … who is enjoying that vision; and al long as I want to continue in that awareness I will be able to do so. For me, though—mystic that I am…—after oscillating back and forth between enjoying the sunset and enjoying that [it is I who is enjoying it], I expect to find the uncompromised sunset more absorbing. [At that point] the string will have been cut. The bird will be free.”[1]

Seasoned, mature reflection on life after death of that caliber can open us to the mystery that death represents. It can also motivate us to live life fully. Once we take away the fear of death, we find we are liberated into a deeper capacity for living. Hence Jesus' statement that he came that we “might have life and have it to the full.”

Speaking of mature perspectives brings to mind my neighbor, Rose. She's getting on in years and is at that point in life where she's fond of telling the same stories over and over again. I noticed my grandfather did the same thing. After he died I realized the stories I heard over and over were the ones I would go on to remember.

One of Rose's dates back to when her husband was dying of cancer. Her ten year old son, Charlie, kept saying, “When Daddy gets better, we're gonna go fishing.” This was long enough ago that the doctor was the same doctor who had delivered Rose's son, so he and the family went back a long way. The doctor said to Rose, “How can I tell little Charlie that his daddy isn't going to get better?”

When Rose tells the story, she lets that sink in for a second. Then she says, “But years later, when Charlie was grown up, I said to him, ‘Charlie, your daddy wasn't able to take you fishing. But now you've got your own little boy, and you can take him.' And you know what?” she asks triumphantly? “He does.”

How fitting that the accumulated wisdom of Rose's life can be summed up in that story. It affirms the mystery of death, while at the same time cherishing the gift of life. Like that hawk illuminated against the bright blue sky, it calls us to spread our wings and soar, tapping into our full potential and growing into the people God is calling us to be.

Amen.



[1] Smith, Huston. Why Religion Matters (New York: HarperCollins, 2001), pp. 270-271.

top

© 2002 . All rights reserved