The Mother God
By Charles Rush
May 14, 2006
Isaiah 66:10-13
[ Audio
(mp3, 3.14Mb) ]
day we lift up our Mother's, remembering among other things, our primal need for mothering. I've been in touch with that this week, as our grand daughter has been with us, aged 3 months. She was napping with me, woke up squirming around happy as could be. At some point, I got my face right up next to hers and she studied it for a minute… and began a wailing cry of bloody murder for all the universe that meant… 'you are not my mother'. Such force and conviction. It is a visceral example of what Martin Heidegger used to call our 'existential angst', the anxiety we feel over the fleeting character of human existence and our tenuous dependence on forces in the world that we are not entirely sure are benevolent. That sense of existential angst, though primal, recurs in our lives in different guises.
I have dreams
every once in a while, mid-life dreams, that are full of confusion and I awake,
not quite sure if I am alive or dead, completely unsure for that few seconds of
waking where I am exactly. Those moments are filled with what the playwright
Samuel Beckett used to refer to as our sense of our own evanescence. It is
remarkable how primordial that experience of dependence is throughout our life,
I presume right through the moment of our death. At our deepest level, we need
the reassurance of the mothering presence in a very fundamental way.
Perhaps you
read the article in the Science section of the New York Times this week that
reminded us that this comforting presence is not necessarily a given throughout
the broad range of nature. They had many examples of Rabbit mothers birthing
their children and abandoning them, various other species of animals exposing
their infants recklessly to danger. So it is not the natural hormonal impulse
that we lift up today, but rather the higher spiritual capacity of compassion
and care that is profound in its more eloquent, mature expression. The bible
tells us that God is like the Mother that looks over us when we are vulnerable,
that lifts us up and completes us, so we can stand on our own.
I think of Gail
Butler who had a characteristic way of communicating to her family through
notes. She was an inveterate writer of little thoughts for her girls that they
would find in their lunch bags, attached to their homework- little words of
encouragement and confidence building, the thought for the day, the moral
instruction. That was who she was.
When the girls
were 12 and 14, Gail was diagnosed with lung cancer, despite not being a
smoker. Her regimen of treatment was aggressive and it left her weak and bed
ridden a fair amount of time. That year was just a difficult year all the way
around. Her girls were in various phases of estrangement that usually mark
early adolescence and they actually sarcastically derided her for not being
able to do things for them like other mothers were doing. There were several
times that Gail was livid with them after these encounters for their
self-absorbsion and lack of compassion. They were the normal heated exchanges
between adolescents and their parents, only she was in bed and rather confined
that way periodically.
Tragically, her
health made a sudden turn for the worse and in a matter of just a couple weeks
in the spring, she went down hill and died, really in the middle of this miasma
of difficulty and alienation. It was just a very sad time for the family and I
presume that it was made worse for the girls because, in addition to the other
range of complicated emotions that they were dealing with -- like abandonment,
lack of courage, anxiety about the future -- I presume that they felt guilty.
They just didn't really think their mother would die and they felt bad about
how they left her. And it was not the type of thing that anyone in the family
could really have addressed with them directly but it was palpable nevertheless.
But Gail didn't
leave it at that. Probably as a way of coping with her worst fears directly,
possibly as a kind of spiritual insurance policy, she left behind a folder full
of notes for her sister. And her sister was a dutiful custodian of them and
mailed them one at a time. There was a note for their birthday, a note for the
prom, a note on what to think about when deciding on college, a note at
graduation, a note for their wedding, a note for their first child. Throughout
that difficult year, she was focused on giving the girls what they would need
to become strong women. She must have had a sense of needing to complete that
no matter what. And what was interesting and moving to see just how well she
predicted what her girls would be like many years later and what they would
need to hear. That kind of compassion that blesses from beyond the grave is not a
natural hormonal by-product. That is an advanced, distilled spiritual essence
of compassion and maturity that is worthy of being emulated. Indeed,
when the bible speaks of feminine images of God, this is most consistently the
type of image that they use. God is that power to bless us, to en-courage us,
to build us up to stand on our own on this side of the grave and beyond.
Aren't we all
in search of that from our Mother's or our Mother figures or our Mother God?
Perhaps you read the popular novel "The Secret Life of Bees", the
story of a young girl named Lily who grows up in rural South Carolina in the 50's. Her mother died in
infancy and her father was one of those all too regular characters from that
era that was emotionally distant and mute with feelings and no ability to give
his own child a sense of her history. So one day Lily heads off as a teenager to find out about her mother,
bearing only a photo of her mother as a young woman holding a jar of Black
Madonna honey from Tiburon, South Carolina.
She wends her
way to this tiny rural crossroads, finds the honey still for sale at the
general store in Tiburon and they tell her where to find the place the place
that makes the honey which turns out to be a group of African-American sisters.
And these sisters, along with many of their friends and neighbors are all
devoted to the adoration of a Black Madonna. This Madonna was the mast head
from a slave ship that capsized off the shore of South Carolina and mysteriously made its way to
shore and was found by the slave women who escaped and made it to shore. They
all took it to be a divine sign. And this is how the matriarch explained it.
"Everyone
knew the mother of Jesus was named Mary, and that she'd seen suffering of every
kind. That she was strong and constant and had a mother's heart. And here she
was, sent to them on the same waters that had brought them here in chains. It
seemed to them she knew everything they suffered…[i]
The people called her Our Lady of Chains. They called her that not because she
wore chains… They called her Our Lady of Chains because she broke them."[ii]
And through the
rest of the story, young Lily finds the fuller story of her mother and ends up
with a warm empathy for what her life was like. In the process she ends up with
a blessing of sorts from her mother just knowing what she went through and what
became of her. And she gets quite a lot of motherly love and guidance from the
sisters that introduce her to the Black Madonna and the secret life of bees.
It is important
dimension of the Divine Spirit that has so obviously been present with our
popular piety from the beginning of Christianity, despite the overlay of
patriarchal structure that the institution gave the Church with the exclusivity
of Men in the priesthood. Ordinary people have always needed that divine
feminine because it expresses one of our primal spiritual longing to be taken
care of in a world of loneliness where we are not quite sure of how we belong
or what our place really is.
We've always
had this piety in and through the devotion to the Madonna, the feminine side of
God. A broad brushed history of this imagery and the different forms of piety
that it engenders is interesting in it's own right but I only have time to look
at a couple things this morning. (Slide
1)
The vast
majority of the images that come to us through the first several centuries are
represented through icons, the two dimensional paintings on wood that
symbolically reflect the divine presence and were placed in homes, on hearths,
where accidents happened, really anywhere that the Divine Spirit was thought to
be needed. In these, the overwhelming majority depict Mary as the Mother of
God, quite formal, (Slide 2) holding
an infant who is usually already adored with an aura or halo that indicates
that he was special and different from the time of toddler status on. It was a
spirituality that lifted up the uniqueness of Jesus, even as it adored the
special place of Mary, as in "Hail Mary, full of grace, blessed art thou
and blessed is the fruit of thy womb Jesus."
(Slide 3) The invocation is incantational and is illustrative of the piety
of the early medieval era that looked principally to religion for supernatural
power to cover the many maladies that we were unable to understand, interpret
or control- from the weather, to plagues, to famines, to the irregularities of
pregnancy. (Slide 4)
Then you see
another phase developing in the high middle ages, from the 11th to the 13th
century, where Jesus and Mary are both depicted as the co-regents of heaven.
Interestingly here, they are really equals in an ontological sense, both of
them finding their place in the great pantheon of beings on the other side that
act as portals for our prayers, some directed through Jesus, others directed
through Mary, depending on content. (Slide
5)
Remembering
that the vast majority of these were painted by men in monasteries, one is
tempted to speculate that they represent the needs that celibate men have for
nurture and a feminine touch, such that Mary was increasingly elevated to the
point that she became not only figuratively but almost literally, the feminine
dimension of the divine.
But what has
interested me the most as I have seen thousands of pictures of the Madonna with
Child in museums and cathedrals across Europe are the depictions that come out of
the early Renaissance, when humanism was in full bloom.
I would point
you towards two quite famous artists, one of them with a quite famous
sculpture, the other with a painting that you probably have never seen. This
first image was done by Leonardo Da Vinci and it is entitled Madonna with Child
and Spindle. (Slide 6) I saw it
first as an exhibition of one painting in a small town of Arrezzo in Tuscany.
I find it
moving for the warm and humane dimension in which Mary and Jesus are both
depicted. In contrast to so many of the traditional images of Mary and Jesus in
which Jesus is depicted as already having a martyr sense of his destiny and
Mary somewhat forlorn about the inevitable fate of her only child, this picture
has them playing together the way that ordinary young women enjoy their
children.
It is set in soft
shades of blue that subconsciously radiate a serenity like unto the Mediterranean sea, particularly as the blue fades into
the Tuscan mountains in the distance. Mary is a teenager and only a teenager.
She has no supernatural prescience into her child's destiny, only the ordinary
pose of a mother letting her child play with hands ready to catch him should he
wiggle dangerously.
And Jesus is
just a child and only a child, blissfully unaware in the way that children are.
It is true that he holds in his hand a cross, reminding the viewers of his fate,
but as the child looks at the cross, he does not recognize or understand the
symbolism. No, and this is what I love about this painting, it is as subtle and
transcendent as real life. The child is actually playing with a spindle used
for wrapping yarn, one of the most common tools of every household in 15th
century Italy. He is twirling it playfully,
unaware of the symbolism, unaware of his destiny. Leonardo let the God man just
be a boy and in its own way, in a warmly humane way, the spiritual pathos of
the moment is not diminished but enhanced. Because in the end, is it really the
supernatural foreknowledge that is the indicator of the Divine presence or the
empathy of the heart that endures tragedy and sadness in the name of love
itself? I think the humanists like Leonardo made a big step forward in changing
the frequency by which we look for the divine in our world. It is not the
extraordinary, not the epiphanic, it is actually right here all around us, the ordinary
love and loss that we share day in and day out that is really the substance of
spirituality.
Finally, I
would share with you one of the most well known sculptures in the world, Michelangelo's
Pietá. (Slide 7) I first saw it in
kindergarten when it came to New York for the World's Fair and I have had
a chance to see it at St. Peter's several times since. On our last trip, I
discovered something you should all try when you get the chance.
I made my
children get up at the crack of dawn, kicking and screaming, and we were the
very first people into St. Peter's at 7:30 or so. At that hour, the only people
in the Church are those attending the morning masses in the alcoves. It is
quiet, reverent, at last a church where you can pray.
And this
statute is beautiful to behold in its own right. But it was designed for prayer
and meditation. It is worth the effort to be able to kneel for a few minutes of
silence and no one flashing a camera.
What interests
me about the piece is the way Mary and Jesus are depicted. Leave aside the
technical skill with which Jesus appears so life like in stone, here he is as a
young man, just recently dead before rigor mortis sets in. Michelangelo makes
quite a break from the traditional piety, still depicted in Mel Gibson's 'The
Passion', a depiction that emphasizes a wounded Jesus bloodied beyond all
recognition. It is as though the gruesome quality of the suffering of Jesus is
what makes his death so spiritually inspiring. Here, none of that is present.
He is simply a young man, tragically cut down in the prime of life, still full
of vigor and sinew. It is not endurance or the torture that makes this moment
sacred, it is the pathos of death itself, the simple humane break between
mother and son.
Michelangelo
does a slight of hand for us to make this point. Mary and Jesus are the same
age. They are both twenty. In that moment, when she holds her dead son, it is
as though she is again cradling her infant. We have caught her in that moment
before her full grief has set in, in that first moment of leaden shock when a
Mother's heart is too heavy for tears.
And her lap is
actually huge. Again, we are presented an optical illusion for Mary's lap is
actually larger than a man's. But in this case it is, symbolically speaking. Mary's
lap is as large as God's holding us in death, holding us through whatever
tragedy we have to endure, like our mother when we were young or our
Grandmother. I remember being young and running to find my Grandmother, jumping
up, wrapping myself in her skirts and lap for protection from bad guys that
were chasing us. Some of them were real fears, others imagined, but what a
great refuge. All of us could stay there for an extended while.
And in the end,
what is it that makes Mary divine, a miraculous conception of a supernatural
being? Or, is it the transcendent capacity for compassionate love whose
embrace will not let go, even in death? Perhaps, Michelangelo was
suggesting, that this is all we really need -- the eternality of compassionate
motherly love -- where time stops still so to speak -- that doesn't explain tragedy, doesn't have an
answer for all the mysteries, but holds on to us in the midst of it. Maybe that
is the whole point of our spiritual lives after all.
So go from this
place and do not despair about the sentimentality of the commercial aspect of
this day, nor the imperfect expressions of thanks from your children and your
spouse, and do not despair if you have no birth children or birth Mother that
you can celebrate with. Remember the eternality of compassionate, comforting
love that we get from all our mother figures and that we mother in each other
on our best days. Stay with that for you, too, quite in spite of yourself, can
manifest the transcendent presence of our Mother God. Amen.
[i]
Sue Monk Kidd, The Secret Life of Bees (New York:
Penguin, 2002) p. 109
[ii]
p. 110.
© 2006
Charles Rush.
All rights reserved.