Christ Church crosses

Christ Church, Summit NJ

Home Page

 

Sermons

 

Feedback
Collection Plate  Donations are welcome! 
[ previous | index | next ] © 2009 Caroline Dean

Lost and Found – A Parable of a Man with Two Sons

August 23, 2009

By Caroline Dean

Luke 15: 1-2, 11-32

[ Audio (mp3, 6.9Mb) ]

Caroline Dean preaching - Aug 23, 2009
 
A s
new residents in this area, getting lost is quickly becoming a part of our routine. I will not elaborate on the time when Brantley and I wandered for 30 minutes, only to discover that the Short Hills Mall is a mile from our house or the time when we paid ten dollars extra in tolls because we had to turn around 3 times, even when we had a GPS system!

In Luke's Gospel, Jesus uses “lostness” as a key metaphor in his three parables. Imagine Jesus settling in to teach a crowd. Soon after he begins, a group of tax collectors and sinners sneak in, folding into the crowd. Upon their arrival, the crowd grows unsettled and the whispering begins. The tax collectors are known for dishonestly gathering funds for the Roman officials. They are considered traitors who have sold out to the higher authorities by betraying their own people in order to get rich. And the “sinners” were shamed for deliberately and persistently neglecting Jewish law. Both of these groups were despised and considered immoral. It was scandalous for Jesus to associate with them.

Imagine the crowd that day, whispering and staring as the others joined them. Imagine everyone watching Jesus closely to see how he would respond. Surely Jesus will send them away, calling them into judgment. He will at least call out their sin and ask them to publicly repent! Barely acknowledging the tensions crowd, Jesus resumes his teaching. The Pharisees become uneasy in response to what they see as a Jesus' passive response. They grumble just loud enough for half of the crowd to hear saying, “This guy welcomes sinners and even eats with them!” Having a meal with an “unclean” member of society was considered a great transgression of social and moral boundaries. Does Jesus not know that as he eats with these people he condones their lifestyle and enables them to dishonor the scriptures? Why does he not call them to repentance?!

Jesus overhears the grumbling of the Pharisees and the whispers of the crowd. He glances over at the new arrivals and notices that they are growing uneasy as well. In response to the Pharisee's accusation that Jesus has not led these sinners to repent, he doesn't get defensive or call out either group, instead he tells three stories. The first story is about a Shepherd with one hundred sheep. The shepherd loses one sheep in the wilderness. He leaves behind the ninety-nine in order to find the one lost sheep. I imagine Jesus looking directly at the Pharisee as he asks, “Which one of you when you lose one sheep would not go out and find it?” “Which one of you would not rejoice when you lay it across your shoulders or throw a party to celebrate?”

Then he tells the second story of a woman who loses one of her ten coins. She scours the house to find it. Again, Jesus directly addresses the Pharisees asking them, “Which one of you if you lose one of your precious things would not do the same as the woman?” “Which one of you would not rejoice you found it?”

Lastly, Jesus tells the story of a man who had two sons. Brantley makes fun of my title for the sermon this week. And to be honest, finding a title for a sermon is one of my least favorite parts of sermonizing. Usually when you write a sermon you get an email from the secretary about a week before you preach. And the pressure is on to come up with a witty title to capture your message. The problem is obvious, I have an idea of what I will preach on, but it is stressful for me to pin it down in 5 words or less this early in the game. And so this week I picked the title of “A Parable of a Man who had two Sons.” This title is not witty or catchy or deep. And I soon came to find out, on our walk to the YMCA, that it is proudly displayed by my name on the sign out front. But I will stick with it, because it says something simple about this passage. We know that this story is about the Prodigal son, who runs away and returns home. And another interpretation of this story emphasizes the “two” wayward sons who have lost intimacy with their father. But Jesus begins this story saying, “There was man who had two sons.” Today, I want to ask “what does this story tell us about that man, about the father?” So let's begin as Jesus begins, “there was a man who had two sons,” even if it is a lame sermon title.

First, what does the story of the Younger Prodigal Son tell us about the Father?

We learn that the father seeks his children like the shepherd who goes out for one of the ninety-nine sheep or the woman who carefully searches for her coin. I imagine that after the younger son leaves, the father inquires for him each time he goes into town. I picture the Father gazing out the window and constantly sitting on the front porch hoping to see his son on the horizon. This is why he is ready upon his younger son's return, because he has been keeping an eye out for him. The older son is probably annoyed at his father's senseless optimism. How can his rebellious brother get all of this attention even in his absence and even when he stabs the entire family in the back? But the Father responds to the prodigal's absence with patience and hope. The story of the younger prodigal son teaches us that the father actively seeks us out to welcome us home.

We also learn from the younger prodigal son about the father's radical generosity. He does not withhold his inheritance from his son, even when his son's request disrespects and deeply offends the father. And when the son returns, after squandering the Father's wealth, he still responds with boundless generosity. I would expect the father to be tentative. Maybe the son would run away with his gifts again, wasting them on a life of luxury and pleasure. Why risk such precious gifts on such an irresponsible son, especially when he doesn't deserve them? But, the father does not respond to the deep suffering caused by his son's absence with resentment or anger, rather he responds with radical generosity and hospitality. The Father gives him new sandals, a robe and a signet ring to signify the son's reconciliation with the family. The “fatted calf” is not only a symbol of a great party, but also a symbol of the father's extravagant generosity.

Lastly, the father displays unwavering mercy towards his son. He runs to his son with his arms wide. And no questions asked he receives his son. There is no testing period or time of penance. There is no inquiry into where the money went. The son wants to make himself his father's slave in order to display his humility and his desperation. But the father immediately receives him as a Son. This poignant scene of reconciliation reminds me of a story that my dad always tells. You know those stories that pass along in your family. Sarah told one a few weeks ago about an Easter Sunday in Church when she was a little girl and she asked her mom if her “tomb was empty.”

This is one of our family's stories. In college my dad wanted to be a physician like his father. And so he studied biology. But he couldn't seem to stay away from religion courses, so he double majored in religion and biology. The summer before his senior year, my dad felt a calling to go to seminary and further his studies in religion (at the time he thought he would teach but he is now a pastor in a Baptist church). Poppa Jack (that's what we called my grandfather) drove him back to Duke University that senior fall. And when Poppa Jack dropped him off at his dorm, my dad finally gathered the courage to tell his father that he didn't want to be a doctor anymore. He anticipated a reaction of disappointment or fake affirmation. However, in this vulnerable moment, Poppa Jack simply leaned over and gave my dad a big bear hug. Which was all my dad needed to know. His father would love and support him no matter what vocation he chose. This father received his son in a moment of tender vulnerability and he accepted him and gave him the freedom to be himself.

Younger prodigal sons are tempted to misunderstand the father's love. We think that because we have screwed up so bad, when we encounter God, we will encounter a God of wrath or at least a disappointed God who will shame us. We expect to pay for our sins. We fear the encounter with God because we have so much guilt for our addictions, our poor choices and our broken relationships. And yet when we finally gather the courage to meet God, we find a tender hug, a ring and sandals, symbols of God's endless generosity and forgiveness. And so let us no longer be enslaved to our disobedience, sitting in pig sties of despair. Let us no longer expect a wrathful God or a God who will shame us. Let us remember that God's grace is boundless and that he calls us Sons and Daughters, never slaves.

Secondly, what do we learn about the father from the story of the older son? First we learn the father does not play favorites. The older son has earned his place of privilege in the father's house. He has been obedient and faithful and he is the one who deserves a party with his friends. He refuses to join the celebration of his brother's return because it is unjust. If anyone should be celebrated, it should be him! How could the father forget all of the pain that his youngest son has caused their family? How could he let him off the hook to quickly? The younger son SHOULD be a slave of their family at least for a while, until he proves that he won't screw up again. This logic makes so much sense to me. I can understand the frustration and pain of the older son.

But the Father refuses to be pinned against either son. He accepts the younger son's passion despite his disobedience. And he accepts the older son's obedience despite his lack of mercy. Just because the shepherd left the ninety-nine to reclaim the one, it does not mean that the ninety-nine are less precious to him. The ninety-nine should rejoice because the father would do the same for them. God's love is not contingent upon a competitive system of rewards and punishments. God loves each of us uniquely and yet somehow this love does not take away from God's love for others.

The Old Testament is riddled with siblings who fight over their father's blessing. Sibling rivalry is not foreign to scripture. Cain kills Abel. Isaac is the chosen child of Israel and Ishmael is not. Jacob steals Esau's birthright. Joseph gets a coat of many colors. Mary sits at Jesus' feet and Martha does the dishes. Even the disciples argue about who gets to sit at the right hand of Jesus. What is it about the love of the father that we somehow think there is only enough for one sibling, for one church, for one expression of Christianity? The father's love is abundant and it is more than enough.

The second thing that we learn from the relationship between the father and the older son is that the father's love compels us to be reconciled with one another. The older brother, jealous of the younger brother's celebration, asks why he has not gotten a party after all of these years of faithfulness. The older son cries out, “but when this “son of yours” came back, you killed the fatted calf for him!” He cannot even refer to the younger son as his brother (he calls him “this son of yours”); he has severed any familial relationship his prodigal brother. Again the father has a right to be defensive and angry that the older son refuses the repentance of his brother. Instead the father responds “Son you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours, but we had to celebrate and rejoice, because this brother of yours was dead and has come to life; he was lost and has been found.” The father reminds the older son of his connection to the younger brother. Subtly he begs his son to receive the prodigal as a brother, to remember their relationship and seek reconciliation. I can imagine the younger brother peering through the window watching the father and older son talk. He also yearns for his brother to forgive him.

Older sons also misunderstand God's love. We think that we deserve the love and attention of the father. We have been so faithful all of these years that the father should throw us a party. The older son says that he “has worked like a slave” for the father. Some of us are tempted to be enslaved to our obedience. With this attitude of resentment and entitlement which attaches itself to the underside of virtue, older sons forget to receive God's love as a gift. We forget that we receive this love just like any other child of God. Older sons think that those who have been disobedient must earn their way to forgiveness; somehow they must publicly get rid of all of their sins. Older sons are tempted to be hard on those who aren't faithful because sinners who are easily forgiven threaten their system of obedience that dictates our lives. All the time God has been saying to the older sons “all that is mine is yours” freely giving to us. And we have fooled ourselves into thinking that we have earned the blessing of the father and somehow we deserve the Father's gifts. Just like the younger son's slavery to disobedience, older sons become slaves trying to earn God's love instead of freely receiving God's grace. Let us remember that God's grace is boundless and that he calls us Sons and Daughters, never slaves.

And so when we realize over and over again that we keep getting lost, let us remember the father's gracious, merciful, unbiased, and reconciling love. And let us learn to receive one another with the love of the Father.  Amen.

 

top

© 2009 Caroline Dean. All rights reserved.