Judgment Without Being Judgmental
By Charles Rush
March 5, 2000
Matthew 7: 1-5
ording to the church calendar, we are about to enter the season
of Lent, which officially begins this Wednesday, Ash Wednesday. So I
trust you will have your pancakes on Tuesday, usually called Shrove
Tuesday. During the Middle Ages the church forbade eating animal fat
during lent, so the custom arose of using up all the fat in pancakes on
Shrove Tuesday, the day before Ash Wednesday. Afterwards everyone
joined in games that cost a penny or two to play. The money raised was
given to the poor. Shrove Tuesday is also known as Mardi Gras (which
is French for "Fat Tuesday")... and I know some of you are
thinking right now what a good idea it would be to embark on a Holy
pilgrimage to New Orleans for it's celebration... Elsewhere in Europe
the celebration featured carnivals and was called Carnivale (as in Rio,
the Mecca of Holy decadence). Carnival, as you may know, literally
means "farewell to meat", as it was the last time for 7
weeks.
Lent has traditionally been a time for penitence and self-denial.
It is a time of taking stock of our lives. Frankly, this is not a bad
concept, properly conceived. It seems to me that most of us under a
certain age spend frightfully little time taking stock of what we are
doing and where we are going. It is enough just to return the calls on
our desk. We are just grinding away in our life rut, with the unspoken
hope that somehow everything worth worrying about is going to just work
its way out if we can just get to the next level in our life. Maybe it
will, particularly if you are fairly shallow person. But it may take
more than this.
I read an article about Muhammad Ali a few years ago. Three times
the heavyweight champion of the world- a feat never duplicated. He has
had his picture on the cover of
Sports Illustrated
more times than any other athlete. At one time, he may well have been
the most popular man on the planet. The sports writer, Gary Smith,
interviewed him a few years ago, to get an update on how he was doing.
They were visiting together in the barn next to Ali's farmhouse.
In the barn, on the floor leaning against the walls, were pictures and
framed newspaper articles from his prime. There were photos of the
champ punching and dancing. There was one picture where his fist was
punching the air. There was also a picture of Ali holding his
championship belt high in triumph. "The thrilla in Manilla"
a framed poster read.
As the sportswriter looked at the pictures he couldn't help but
notice that they were covered with white streaks- bird droppings. Just
then the ex-champ looked into the rafters at the pigeons who made his
gym their home. Then perhaps as a statement of despair, Ali walked
over to the row of pictures and one by one turned them face down. Then
he walked out the door and stared out at the countryside. He mumbled
something so low the sportswriter asked him what he said. "I had
the world," Muhammad Ali repeated, "and it wasn't nothing.
Look now." A sobering thought.
It may well be the case that you get to that level where you think
it should all work out and it won't all work out. There are good
reasons to take stock occasionally.
This season, I thought we might use the season of Lent to take a
peek at where we want to go. If you could be a spiritually rounded
person, what would you look like? What qualities, what virtues would a
rounded person have?
This week, Jesus refers us, in two independent stories to the
quality of making judgments without being judgmental.
Legalism, as a spiritual disposition, I've come to conclude, is so
pervasive in our world because it matches the psychological disposition
for so many people who prefer order and control above profundity and
insight.
There may be nothing more enervating to the soul of the university
professor than these six words, "will this be on the test?"
Usually they are uttered about that way, most of the time after a
moment of intoxicating intellectual speculation. Professors get this
blank pensive stare. I can tell you what they are thinking. They are
wondering about heaven. "What if there is only country music
there? What if the big excitement every night is 'Who wants to be a
Millionaire?' What if the really good people get to bowl once a
month?"
Some people are just like that... all they want to know is what is
on the exam. Some people just don't feel comfortable outside of the
box, don't know what to do outside of the box, don't wonder what's
outside of the box. In the long march of human history, this accounts
for billons of people.
I heard about a group that was on a corporate retreat for goal
development. The retreat leader was trying to get the managers to
branch out into another realm of being than the ordinary roles of the
work place. He handed out large sheets of manila construction paper
and asked people to draw an emotion. He wanted them to use the full
sheet of paper, to fill in every space with some color. 15 minutes go
by, he's walking around... One guy is just sitting there with a few
lines on his sheet, frozen, immobile... The guy says to him "I
can't do this... you don't understand, I really can't do
this."
Catholics complain to me pretty regularly about the rules in the
Catholic Church. It is true that there are a lot of rules. I believe
that the sum total of Canon Law runs 30 some odd volumes. That is a
lot of rules. Small print. Ex-Catholics often point out to me that it
is somewhat ironic the founder of Christianity wanted to reduce all the
rules of Judaism to just two - love God and love your neighbor - and
the Church turned right around and made rules to cover every
conceivable situation. But if you want to know why that developed, it
is because the people demanded it. They want salvation reduced to a
formula that they can follow. From the get go, they came to the Bishop
and asked how to attain salvation?
You want to go to heaven, get baptized, go to Mass weekly,
and say your prayers."
But Father, suppose you can't go to Mass weekly, suppose you
have to skip because your work takes you deep into the wilderness where
there is no church."
Then my Son, offer the Church $50 in the offering plate and
someone will say a Mass for you that week."
But Father, suppose the money I use to pay for the Mass was
earned by means not honorable and full of moral compromise... because
Father, my work demands it?
Then say 5 Hail Mary's and ask for God's forgiveness and
mercy as you drop the money in the plate for the Mass...
And on and on it went... So that after 2000 years of people asking
us all the time, "will this be on the test", we have a pretty
substantial body of Canon Law.
Some people just plain need a lot of rules, they like a lot of
structure. I suppose you either found it amusing or mystifying this
week that the president of Bob Jones University in South Carolina,
finally came out with the groundbreaking resolution that... watch
out... interracial dating was Okay.
And that was a big deal at the fundamentalist, Bob Jones University
because the whole logic of their spirituality runs like this. If you
compromise morally on this issue, then you open the door for compromise
on other issues. You keep compromising, keep compromising and the next
thing you know all the Co-eds at Bob Jones University will be
streaking, drinking, and a bunch of atheists... just like Brown
University. They have to be intolerant, in their mind, in order to be,
morally pure. I don't know if you happened to see the editorial in the
New York Times by a recent graduate of Bob Jones University but he
describes life on campus there. It was so quaint it was almost cute.
You can only date under the supervision of a chaperon, in the parlor of
the dorms, and then there was the six-inch rule. You have to keep six
inches of distance between you and your date at all times... Makes you
want to say, "Gee Willikers...let's go get a malted?"
This moral casuistry is all about control. Very often, it combines
well with anger. That was the one thing that went unsaid this week in
the exchanges between Senator John McCain and Pat Robertson and Jerry
Falwell. Senator McCain was widely criticized for his remarks about
the religious right in the Republican Party, perhaps rightfully so.
But he was right about one thing. Too many leaders of the Religious
Right are angry men and their anger drives their religion. They need a
liberal enemy or a secular enemy to generate enthusiasm. They have to
have something to overcome, something to reform and rescue from the
clutches of Evil. Theirs is not a positive spirituality, nor is it a
spirituality of bridge building because it is driven by anger. It is
always divisive. That is why there is a joke about Baptists in the
South. Every time they have a church fight, the losing group leaves,
starts a new church and they call it missions. Sadly, there is a lot
of truth to that. Too many people need structure and
But, he also lived a life that stood for something. He lived for
the Kingdom of God. He lived for those values. He had convictions.
Ultimately he died for them. The other challenge is to also make
judgments.
That is harder for most of us, particularly in areas of religion.
We have been educated in the great liberal tradition. We know that the
Church has flaws. We know that that the Bible has some problems. We
know that there are many religions in the world, many philosophies that
have been generated. Each of them has some truth to it, some insight.
Some seem to work better for some types of people. But, frankly, it is
almost impossible to adjudicate between two competing truth claims.
All of these sorts of things seem to be relative to culture and
history, making it hard to talk about things from an ultimate
perspective. So what do we do? We have a very cultivated way of
engaging all these different things. If nothing else, we do believe in
surveying all the options, all the evidence. And we have a very
sophisticated, cultivated way of keeping our options open.
We are not very big on commitment; we are big on being open. We
don't like religions that make a lot of demands on us; we want
something that is user-friendly. When it comes to religion, we are
like a guy I knew named Leo - witty, charming, engaging, well traveled,
spoke 3 languages and could make clever puns in all three. He was
great at a cocktail party - always had funny repartee, pulled from a
deep memory the perfect quote from Hemingway to fit the moment,
gregarious, engaging. After knowing him for years, and being delighted
by him for years, my wife asked me what he would think about a moral
crisis that we were all involved in. I thought about it for a moment
and said, "I haven't the foggiest idea what he would think about
it." The reason I didn't know is because he didn't know. But
he had his options open.
No the other part of this, the harder part for us, is forming some
judgments, developing some convictions, articulating our values. We'd
rather not actually verbalize some of them because then we might have
to question some of them, might have to make some changes. In the
physical world, the only things that consistently flow downstream, the
only things that go with the flow, the current... are dead. More of
us, on the spiritual level, need to begin the discipline of at least
saying to ourselves, "in my considered opinion" when we read
the paper every day. We need to be making some moral judgments,
reflecting on our spiritual values, and practice actually verbalizing
what we believe at least to ourselves. Maybe with some other people in
your church that are trying to develop some spiritual values for
themselves.
Tolerance is an important virtue. But it doesn't take the place of
commitment. The trick is to have convictions and compassion, to be
broad-minded and believing, to be understanding and judicious. You want
to become a person of substance because for all its titillation and
glory, Mohammed Ali is right about how quickly it all fades... "I
had the world... and it wasn't nothing". We you're old, you
don't want someone to ask you kids what you stood for and have them
get silent and thoughtful for a moment and say "I don't
know."
Amen.
© 2000 .
All rights reserved