To Honor and Respect
By Charles Rush
September 17, 2006
Romans 2: 7-9
[ Audio
(mp3, 7.1 Mb) ]
e world in which we live, sometimes you gotta wonder. A friend of mine was filling out some paperwork on the Maternity ward when a woman walked up to him. She was overdue, stood there with her swollen belly, as her physician wanted her to come in so that he could induce her labor. She was a little tired, confused, or both, so she said to my friend, "Sir, I'm here to be seduced!" At that he looked up from his paper work, wandered over to her, put his hand on her belly and said, "Ma'am you already have been."
But this cuts
both ways, I heard about another woman that checked into the Maternity ward,
and started filling out an information form entitled "Some Questions for
our Pregnant Patients". The third question, 'what is your gender?'
This morning I
wanted to say something about the importance of developing respect and a sense
of honor in our children and in our world. And it is a challenge in our every
day world, not just because of boneheadedness.
Perhaps you read
the paper on Friday. There was an article on former Governor Jim McGreevy that
describes our daily grind around the erosion of respect. Mr. McGreevy has a
book coming out on Tuesday with a big interview on Oprah the same day that has
already been taped. His publishers and he were hoping to pitch a book with an
inspirational view of how he came to grips finally with his sexual identity and
dealt with that.
Of course,
certain newspapers were more interested in the salacious nature of his affair
when he was in office. One paper obtained an illegally released advanced copy
of the book and used it to be the first paper to detail as much lurid material
as possible.
The article
quoted one publisher saying, ' in this business, you just don't know who to
trust, who to believe, what is really going on.' It is a race to the bottom. Mr.
McGreevy's actions aside, our actual world is inundated with compromised
narratives, intrigues, duplicity, one-upsmanship that is willing to break
rules, and the exploitation of others weakness whenever possible.
It reminds me
of a conversation I used to have with my daughter Annie when she was just
starting soccer at 6. Before the game, I would say, 'Okay honey, remember the
rules, 1) It's not how you play the game but whether you win or lose. 2) Never
pass the ball when you can shoot. 3) If the ref can't see you kick your
opponent to the ground.' She would look back at me and say, "Dad, you're a
Minister, remember?"
And this
exchange would be just light hearted but we are living in a world of such
instant information exchange that the issue of respect is becoming a much more
vital social virtue. As you probably know, the Pope was giving an academic
lecture in Germany this week. In his first life the
Pope was a professor at the University of Tubingen. In his lecture about the danger of
violence and religion, he quoted an emperor from the 14th century. His remarks
were almost instantly broadcast around the world, mostly out of context. What
was interesting to see is how they were intentionally distorted, how various
intentions were read into them, and how often people were willing to use this
opportunity to advance their opinion completely independent of the lecture
itself. Carelessness and inattention are typical and symptomatic of a culture
of disrespect.
Our concept of
respect, at root, is indicated by the Latin word respicere which means to
"look back at" or "to look again". It contains within it an
understanding "to examine carefully" or "to pay attention
to".[1]
This is so
fundamental in our families, in our relationships with our spouses. Have you
ever gotten to an impasse with your spouse or your children where you said,
'Are you even listening to me?' That anger that you feel inside comes from a
sense that you are not being valued, that your needs are not seen as important.
It is the sense that you are not being respected as a person. It is basic to
human dignity that we are listened to, that someone pays attention to us.
That is why it
becomes a moral issue for us when our words are willfully distorted. Any of our
community leaders, any of our politicians have had that awful experience of
reading your comments inadvertently or overtly misquoted in the papers with the
realization that thousands of people are going to read this and think you are
here when you are really there. The public nature of that makes it maddening.
And some of us
have had the experience of being involved in a public dispute in our
corporations, only to discover that people who disagree with us, have willfully
and intentionally misused our words in order to make us look bad and manipulate
the situation to their advantage. That too is maddening.
Probably all of
us at the moment experience some sense of this when we try to understand what
is going on in Iraq or in the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. So much of what is
reported is done so with an editorial view in mind that it is just
transparently prejudiced. You just cannot find a single source that even
appears to be trying to objectively describe what is actually happening on the
ground in all of its complexity. We have to read 8 different clearly
prejudicial sources and surmise, trying to refract the writers' fears, desires,
and interpretations.
Finally, this
is the profound longing of the teeming masses of impoverished around the world.
They feel transparent and in an existential sense, they do not exist, because
at a fundamental level, they do not feel heard. I was listening to someone on
our trip to Nicaragua with Leanne Wells. They were
explaining how they came to be drug addicted and prostituted themselves and
that got into a personal story about child abuse, running away. It took them a
while to tell it. At one point they were holding my arm, and tears were
streaming down their face… Towards the end, they said, with deep emotion,
'thank you for listening to me.' Like somehow because we are Americans and
care, their concern had been officially registered. We are both thinking, we
are only being human, but we don't have that experience that a couple billion
people live with every day that they aren't important enough for anyone to
care. This is deeper than politics, it cuts to our very identity spiritually,
our very subjectivity.
Paying
attention and being careful are fundamental to respect. Every one of us says
"You don't have to agree with me, but please understand me". That to
me is the power of the spiritual teaching of Jesus when he says that God knows
all of the hairs of our head, what we need, what we are anxious about. God does
pay attention to us. God is careful. God cares. God has compassion. This what
the Gospel of John means when it says that God is love.
In our Western
tradition, this fundamental spiritual concept was rationalized by Immanuel
Kant, the first philosopher to respect for people at the very center of his
moral theory. Kant emphasized over and over again that people are ends in
themselves.[2]
They have intrinsic worth that is absolute and objective. Each and every person
is thus accorded dignity. That is the theme that Jefferson enunciated when he said "We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all of us were created with the
right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (or the higher reasons for
which we live). This is the foundation of our humanist tradition. It is the
foundation of our political democratic society. It is the basis for the
international declaration of human rights.
Respect that
begins with 'paying attention' elicits from us the response of reverence. At the
most basic level, that means that we alter our behavior. We defer to others. We
do not erase ourselves, but neither do we simply proceed with our own ego needs
and our own egoistic desires as definitive. We alter our behavior to take
others into consideration.[3]
Jesus said,
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". So, we teach our
children not to violate each other. Hitting is not acceptable. Neither is it
acceptable to insult one another or to Bully others to get your way.
As parents of
young children know, this is becoming a bigger challenge than it was just a few
years ago. Our youngest children are exposed to cartoons that routinely depict
a combative acrimony among the characters, not surprisingly our youngest
children model this right away.
And our
children that are old enough to take in a steady diet of reality TV shows that
feature groups of teenagers locked in houses with plots designed to bring out
catty, puerile fights- are also exposed to the regular use of aggressive
combative language so full of expletives that the on-screen dialogue is a near
continuous beep.
This is the
opposite of respect. It is contemptuous. It disdains others. It degrades. It
discounts others. Verbal violence, like physical violence and other forms of
intimidation are disrespectful and not acceptable.
We hope to teach
our children to follow the rules, to obey figures in authority, unless there
are exceptional circumstances in which they have forfeited their authority.
Even if you disagree with your teachers or your coach or the President of the United States, you respect the office and the one
who holds it.
It is important
that our children see us involved in supporting our schools, together in
church, and modeling for them a certain self-restraint for the rules both great
and small.
At the same time that we want to
teach this to our children, we also expose them week in and week out to the
broader culture of the irate sports fan parents here in Northern New Jersey and I suspect all across the nation.
I'm quite sure that my neighbors in Short Hills do not understand the degree to
which they undermine their authority on the issue of respect when they whine
and crab at the top of their lungs to the referees in every soccer match. It is
clear that in the Garden State, we have too many parents that seem
to think that ranting over an off-sides call is getting in touch with their
inner-child.
Talk about
awkward, one of my son's referring a game, had to toss one my neighbors out of
the baseball game he was coaching for verbal violence that verged on physical violence.
I said, 'tell me this wasn't someone from Christ Church?' My son said, "No,
not Christ Church, dad." Whew… dodged a bullet. But talk about a tough conversation,
explaining how the adult can behave like a child while the teenager has to
behave like the adult. We need better
leadership in these small things, for as Aristotle used to note, collectively
they create the broad cultural ethos that forms the rising generation.
And that is
also why we need a broad support for our teachers and our coaches, especially
when they enforce rules, another issue that seems to run through all of our
towns in Metropolitan New York. I ran into one of our coaches this year that
coached my children. We were reminiscing and one incident came up when one of
our kids was benched for too many detentions. I distinctly remembered that
because it was a big game coming up and our child really cried. It may have
been the first time that they got it that detentions were important. Coach says
to me, "I want to thank you for the way you handled that." I was a
little nonplussed and then coach said, "Nowadays, I get all these phone
calls from parents questioning decisions like that and putting pressure on me
to reverse judgment."
The implicit message that we model is
that rules are important but your success is more important than the rules. If
we model for them that they are the exception, we should not be surprised that
they take longer to interiorize the virtue of obeying them or that they have a
more substantially painful lesson to learn years from now as young adults when
they aren't the exception in the big game. No, our teachers, our coaches, our
administrators need our support to mitigate entitlement and encourage respect.
Ultimately,
what we hope is for our children to interiorize a sense of honor, that they are
doing what they are doing because it is inside them, not for exterior rewards
or fear of punishments. Respect for others and respect of self are integrally
related. They reinforce and strengthen one another.
Some of our colleges,
Wake Forest among them, still have an honor code
that you sign when you go to school that says that you will not cheat or
plagiarize any material. No exceptions period. Students will tell me how
difficult they find this, being given an exam, told that they are to take it
for one hour and only one hour wherever they want to and that they are expected
not to use any notes and turn it back in.
But they live
in a world where they can buy their term papers on-line, where they can Google
just about any phrase or question and down load a ream of material. And they
live in a world where we stack an enormous amount of pressure on them for sheer
success. The temptation to cheat for an edge is big and getting bigger all the
time. And you can get away with it for a short while theoretically.
But ultimately,
that is another matter. Ultimately, Google is going to require more honesty out
of us also. When we post my sermons on the internet, if I leave a quote
unattributed, within six months, someone writes our webmaster Paul Tukey to complain. If I tell a story that
is not true but I read it in some book of illustrations and thought it was
clever, within six months, someone writes our webmaster Paul Tukey to complain. Ultimately, you gotta
do your own work, for better and worse, and Google is going to make us all more
honest as Bob Dylan found out this week when some fan discovered that some of
his lyrics on his latest album came from an obscure poet for the Confederacy in
the 19th century.
Ultimately, we
all want to develop an internal sense of honor that we do what we do because
that is who we are and we do not require outside pressure or rewards to
motivate us to do what is right.
As a virtue,
respect is going to become more important in the next couple generations, not
just for our families, not just for our communities, but in the wider social
world that we must all develop. At root, this is one of the fundamental issues
coming to the fore in our present impasse with terrorists and in the regional
conflicts in the Middle East. In the midst of fear, contempt, xenophobia, a lack of understanding- we
have to figure out how to create a climate that fosters the rudimentary
development of respect. As communications technology increases, so the global
issues will also be felt locally and with great urgency. Today in the second
hour, Frank Bolden is going to talk to us about diversity. I gave him the
working title, "The Spiritual Beauty of Diversity", probably more
title than he needed. But that is, in fact, where we are headed, to the place
where we can genuinely, authentically, respectfully appreciate the Spiritual
beauty of diversity. Amen.
[1]
These observations are drawn from a very fine article from the Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy on "Respect". You can find the article on
line at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/respect/ . I should warn the casual
reader that this sermon considerably condenses and dumbs down the ideas of the
article to fit them into the format of a sermon.
[2]
Ibid. the same article. See 2.2. I apologize that I must truncate "The
Metaphysic of Morals" to such an extent.
[3]
Ibid. see pp. 3 ff.
© 2006
Charles Rush.
All rights reserved.