Christ Church crosses

Christ Church, Summit NJ

Home Page

 

Sermons

 


Collection Plate  Donations are welcome! 
[ previous | index | next ] © 2011 Charles Rush

You Are What You Expect [i] [ii]

By Charles Rush

June 26, 2011

Matthew 6: 33

[ Audio (mp3, 6.7Mb) ]


W i
nston Churchill once observed that “A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” This was a man well acquainted with this subject matter.

Pessimism seems to abound in certain fields more than others, economics among them, as most of us here know from reading their work each and every week. Barry Asmus once said of his colleagues that economists appear to learn pessimism deeply – after all, "they have predicted eight of the last three recessions".

The germ for this sermon came from an article in the New York Times magazine many months ago that relied on a series of studies on our attitudes towards the future.[iii] We are, of course, an admixture of both optimism and pessimism. Curiously, people tend to be overly optimistic about the prospects of their own personal future. That is, they tend to overestimate their own abilities and they tend to overestimate their own ability to control the future. We view ourselves as residents of Garrison Keillor's Lake Wobegon, where "all the men are strong, all the women are good looking and all the children are above average." The article goes on to suggest that these are positive illusions that help us to actually venture out to try more than we ever would if we had a realistic assessment of our situation and our competence.

Others have argued that these positive illusions persist in our collective attitudes nationally, as suggested by Nobel Laureate Daniel Kanheman and Jonathon Renshon several months ago in Foreign Policy magazine, to explain how we got into Iraq and later found ourselves adjudicating a protracted civil war.[iv] Perhaps you've seen that piece of video feed that has 30 of our politicians interviewed right at the onset of the invasion of Iraq, answering the question of where we will be in a year or two, and when will we get out. No one wanted to answer the question in detail naturally. But, every single one of them was not only off the mark- but woefully off the mark, on both sides of the aisle. Truth be told, the rest of us just weren't caught on tape, but we all deserve a big heaping of humble pie. The authors suggest that this war wasn't so much a triumph of hawks over doves as it was the triumph of our positive illusions about our ability to control the future.

Again, curiously, our positive illusions personally and nationally tend to give way to pessimism when we think globally. When the lens is opened to zoom out and wide angle, we tend to think that our best days are behind us and the future portends decline, scarcity, and controlled chaos. It is almost as if we give voice to our collective subconscious that we as a species are in the mid-life phase of our evolution, looking back nostalgically at the warm fuzzy memories, minimizing the struggles and frustrations, anticipating the dissolution of our collective health and our eventual terminus.

Apparently the latest round of research on the general subject of our optimism and pessimism has noted of 'closed-loop feedback mechanisms' that tend to reinforce our basic disposition. In everyday language, there is a self-fulfilling quality to our outlook on life. In one interesting study that many of us somewhat acquainted with looked at gambling comparing pessimists and optimists on their ability to sustain risk. One presumes that a very similar study could have been done on equity traders.

Dr. Brian Gibson and Dr. David Sanbonmatsu[v] found that optimists tended to remember their victories and minimize their losses, whereas pessimists were 61% more likely to remember their losses and minimize their gains at the black jack table. And that way of viewing the world translates into predictable behavior. In a losing streak, pessimists are more likely to quit playing earlier and cut their losses before the chips are all gone. Optimists tend to stay in the game longer, presuming their luck will turn, even if the odds are stacked against them. It is interesting that we project our disposition onto our behavior and we also interpret what we actually do in such a way that we refract our memories to reinforce our disposition to continue to behave that way in the future.

This is why we have more and more parents nowadays that reflect on what they are teaching and modeling for their children because they are aware of the persistence and gravity of our fundamental dispositions. I once asked my 75 year old mother if she could summarize in a sentence what she learned from her parents, a tough question to answer, but often revealing. She said, "The wolf is at the door", reflecting the experience of those adults that lived through the Great Depression in our country in the thirties, as well as that reserve and caution so pervasive in my Dutch ancestors.

It will be interesting to see how our children answer that question in 4 decades time. Whatever their answer, it most assuredly will not be 'the wolf is at the door'. But all of us are aware of the power that we have to shape the next generation and how powerfully we were shaped by the previous generation.

This is the profound meaning of the text this morning from Numbers that says "The sins of the Fathers are visited upon the Children unto the third and fourth generation." For better and worse, the consequences of what we do, how we live, and the values that we articulate are not only horizontal- affecting our friends and family around us- they are also vertical, stretching down the generations in ways that we could not anticipate and perhaps would not intend.

And one of the important goals of developing a healthy, responsible sense of self as an adult, is being aware of how we have been formed, but not letting that definition exhaustively control our sense of purpose and destiny. The past is important. It is fundamentally formative. We cannot entirely escape it. But it needs to be balanced by the pull of our own future.

This is simply one dimension of what Jesus suggests in Matthew this morning. "Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and all these other things will be added to you." In the teaching of Jesus, the Kingdom of God, is the future pull of the Spirit in our lives. It is the 'not yet', the 'unknown', it is the hope of things not yet seen. It is promissory in nature. It is collective in nature, so it is bigger than our personal hopes and dreams, and yet our personal hopes and dreams are part of it too. Jesus suggests that the pull of the future of God is as powerful and healing as the push of the past has been controlling and determined.

For most of us this is a gradual process that works itself out in young adulthood and it continues to be a challenge throughout our lives.

Kevin Brownson sat in his car, idling, as he looked up the lawn at this home all a glitter with the seasonal lights inviting the warmth and peace of winter and perhaps a fire. He was thinking to himself that it wasn't all that bad, the phrase 'all that bad' which had been roiling around in his mind like loose change in a dryer for the past 24 hours.

The previous afternoon, he'd been sitting with a therapist and his wife, listening to her describe all of his worst features and some of his best caught in a poor light so as to accentuate the dimension that even his virtues weren't entirely what they seem. He sat there in enforced silence- this was the point of the exercise for him to just listen without being able to respond- getting more and more defensive, thinking that this description was somewhat unfair and somewhat untrue.

He spent the rest of the evening and most of the next day coming back to this caricature. Every free moment it seemed, he would envision this statute of vice that had been depicted for him, draping it with another adornment of virtue here, an accessory of interesting characteristic there, so that by the drive home, he could almost envision the original ugly model and at once the overlay of his redaction so that finally he had an image of himself that he could recognize as something like who he actually was.

He kept telling himself that he really wasn't that bad, that this whole exercise was really unfair and not helpful. At odd times during the day, he would think of pitching the whole relationship, pitching his whole life, even though this was not really an option. Shortly after that thought left him, he would come back to this dis-ease, this lack of fulfillment, this vague ennui that his wife described. When he thought about his wife articulating this sentiment, a defensiveness arose within him, a low-grade rage about the presumption, the sheer arrogance, the … whole damn exercise was just irritating.

But in a moment, that would pass and as it did, he was left himself with the unsettling reality that he wasn't really happy either… And why not? And what constitutes happiness anyway?

He had driven home that evening past so many of the landmarks that dotted the scenery of his life, past the hospital where two of his children were born, passed the elementary school they all attended, over to the pool to pick one of them up. With each turn, he was reflecting on how solid and grounded their life was, and that really he'd done a good job… they'd done a good job.. and life could be a lot worse. And it was good, but… And it was good, but…

All the time, these images from his own childhood kept bubbling to the surface. They were an odd collection and occasionally he would try to focus on one of them only to discover that he couldn't recall many of the details around it anymore. There he was at St. Leo's school winning an award in 8th grade. There he was walking out to mid-field with the two other Co-Captains to flip a coin at the beginning of the football game. There he was camping on what turned out to be a strange night in Boy Scouts. Good memories really, crisp… at one point, he almost said out loud to himself, 'a lot of uniforms' and he could see himself as an Acolyte.

He was remembering how competitive his brothers all were and the time he broke his brother Michael's collarbone in a wrestling move that pitched them both off the back deck.

He was thinking about what he had achieved, about how he had graduated with honors and how proud his parents were, the partial scholarship to college, just barely getting into the Big East law school, and paying for it himself. He could hear the aphorisms that his father used to extol at the dinner table or after the game- these tidbits of wisdom on how to succeed, maxims on how to keep a competitive edge.

He nodded his head, half in mirth, half in derision, at the way that these little maxims to live by almost completely defined what he knew of his father and how they had been good guides nevertheless. He was thinking how good he had been at following the rules, how good he was when everything was defined and you knew what the goal was. And he was swept with a wave of sorrow that very nearly became a full blown self-pity thinking of this kid who followed the rules had somehow become this man who wasn't entirely sure even what the game was around him, full of frustration and anxiety. Why was this so hard?

He was sitting in his car out in front of his house, looking up at the lights. It was a nice view. It was a nice life. He was thinking of himself the way most people thought of himself and he was thinking of the way his wife viewed him in that therapy session. He looked up at his neighbors homes and thought of one image and the other image and suddenly he wanted to cry. The lights were twinkling out of focus when he said out loud, 'There is so much more… There is so much more to me'.

And there is so much more. You come to this realization at some point that, without intending it, you have been living someone else's expectations for you, you've been reading out of someone else's script. It may be a good script even but it doesn't work because there is so much more to you than this script asks you to deliver. And there are these key resources of creativity, there is a sense of being fully engaged and alive spiritually that you are not accessing. You've been pushed along by the streams of the past and you have ridden them up to this place but they won't be enough in and of themselves to unlock that deeper meaning to life that you hunger for.

Who are you really? What would it take for you to find that deeper fulfillment? On your best days, in an imaginative moment, what would you look like if you could really awaken your spouse so that they were alive and rich in personality, engaged, interesting,… really alive....Spiritually resonant…. Creative.

The most important dimension to this challenge comes not from the past but from the future. It is not enough to just look back on who you were and where you've been. Who are you becoming? Where are you headed?

That is a much more difficult question to answer isn't it? And it is not just the unknowing about the future, it is also the spiritual energy and creative resolve that it takes to paint a vision. It is much harder to make choices and know deep in your heart that all this responsibility lies solely with you. It is much easier to beg off this mission, staying preoccupied with the responsibilities of the challenging present, as though the present lived day after day, somehow miraculously becomes our future. It is much easier to give ourselves excuses for why the picture of our future contains such a stunted and vague cameo by rehearsing family scripts from the past again and again, giving ourselves a certain well deserved permission to defer the future until we can resolve the limitations of our past. This looking back at the past, this focus on the limitations of the past, it works for a long time, sometimes for a very long time, until you catch yourself consciously doing it and it becomes painfully evident how banal this self- justification for mediocrity really is. You realize, you just have to let it go. True but it can't be definitive.

No, the truth is, that more than half of the healing of the past actually comes from the healing power of a new future that pulls you on to where you need to be to realize just how much more there is of you than the limited script that your well-meaning family had for you or your dysfunctional family- those myriad layers of constriction they laid upon you. Jesus taught us "Seek ye first The Kingdom of God". It is out ahead.

It is true that Jesus gave us quite a lot of content about the future pull of the Kingdom of God and that content is an important guide. But part of it you can't define exhaustively because part of it involves you. Who is it that you are meant to become? That, of course, can only be answered by you. That question may never be done in isolation. We are always in relational community and we can't answer that question maturely or profoundly without some insight and feedback from our spouse, our loved ones, the beloved community. But there is important introspection that is required. Who are you essentially? Who are you becoming?

This is not as simple as defining your future assets or designing a new home. None of us are entirely sure we really know who we need to become and most of our significant changes can't just be bought, leased or employed.

But all of the hope that the future holds, all of the promise, all of the imagination and creativity… what a powerful spiritual pull, what a healing spiritual pull.

And all of the realism about seeing ourselves as we actually are, all of the psychological insight about how we became who we are in light of the subterranean forces of the past… what a powerful awareness of self.

Be more… Become more… Read from your own script…Seek ye first the Kingdom of God, and all these other things will be added unto you… Amen.



[i] This Title comes from Holt's work listed below and the first piece is entirely indebted to his research and conclusions.

[ii] Note: a version of this sermon was preached by Dr. Rush on October 7, 2007.

[iii] See Jim Holt's, 1.21.07, from the Way We Live Column, NY Times, January, 21, 2007, pps. 15-16.

[iv] See the January issue from 2007. I did not have time to find the article and actually read it before publication of this sermon. Any misrepresentation of their thesis is entirely my fault. I simply presume that this is obvious enough that it is not controversial.

[v] I found this on www.medicalnewstoday.com from 15 February, 2004. The full study was published in the February, 2004 issue of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

top

© 2011 . All rights reserved.